<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global IP Watch - Intellectual Property for International Professionals &#187; priority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalipwatch.com/tag/priority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalipwatch.com</link>
	<description>Intellectual Property for International Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:06:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>TTAB rules minimual evidence of actual confusion suffuicent for summary judgemnt on liklihood of confusion where mark identical to prior famous mark used on identical goods</title>
		<link>http://www.globalipwatch.com/2010/03/24/ttab-rules-minimual-evidence-of-actual-confusion-suffuicent-for-summary-judgemnt-on-liklihood-of-confusion-where-mark-identical-to-prior-famous-mark-used-on-identical-goods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalipwatch.com/2010/03/24/ttab-rules-minimual-evidence-of-actual-confusion-suffuicent-for-summary-judgemnt-on-liklihood-of-confusion-where-mark-identical-to-prior-famous-mark-used-on-identical-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leah Jagusch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States: Trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summary Judgment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalipwatch.com/?p=1311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Texas Department of Transportation v. Richard Tucker, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (&#8220;TTAB&#8221;) unanimously granted the Texas Department of Transportation&#8217;s (&#8220;TxDOT&#8221;) motion for summary judgment, holding no genuine issue of material fact existed and Richard Tucker&#8217;s (&#8220;Tucker&#8221;) mark was likely to cause confusion. TxDOT and Tucker both claimed use of and registered the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalipwatch.com/2010/03/24/ttab-rules-minimual-evidence-of-actual-confusion-suffuicent-for-summary-judgemnt-on-liklihood-of-confusion-where-mark-identical-to-prior-famous-mark-used-on-identical-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

